ACE DI-305 NG vs Powertrac Steeltrac 18
Comparing the ACE DI-305 NG and the Powertrac Steeltrac 18 — the ACE DI-305 NG carries 9.8 HP more, and the Powertrac Steeltrac 18 is about ₹1.65 lakh cheaper ex-showroom. The specifications below are from the manufacturers; the section under them explains what those differences mean on an actual farm.
Which one should you buy?
Both of these are sold into the same segment, so the choice comes down to a handful of real differences rather than one being better than the other outright.
Price
The Powertrac Steeltrac 18 is roughly ₹1.65 lakh cheaper ex-showroom — about 40% less than the ACE DI-305 NG. On road that gap widens slightly, because RTO tax and insurance are calculated on the higher figure. Whether the ACE DI-305 NG earns that back depends entirely on the points below; if it does not, the cheaper machine is the better buy.
PTO power — the number that matters
Engine horsepower is the headline; PTO horsepower is what actually turns a rotavator or a thresher. Here the ACE DI-305 NG delivers 11.4 HP more at the PTO (ACE DI-305 NG: 23.8 HP, Powertrac Steeltrac 18: 12.4 HP). That is roughly the difference between comfortably running a wider rotavator and working the engine hard to do it.
Lifting capacity
The ACE DI-305 NG lifts 650 kg more (ACE DI-305 NG: 1200 Kg, Powertrac Steeltrac 18: 550 KG). This decides which mounted implements the tractor can actually carry, and it is where cheaper models usually cut corners. Check it against the heaviest implement you own — loaded weight, not the dry weight in the brochure.
Engine
The ACE DI-305 NG runs 2 cylinders against the Powertrac Steeltrac 18's 1. More cylinders generally means smoother running and less vibration over a long day, at the cost of a little more fuel and slightly dearer servicing. Fewer cylinders is simpler to maintain, which matters if your nearest workshop is far.
Weight
The ACE DI-305 NG is about 839 kg heavier. Weight is an advantage when braking a loaded trolley or pulling hard in draft work, and a disadvantage in wet fields and on soft ground where the Powertrac Steeltrac 18 will compact less and sink less.
The short answer
Taken together the ACE DI-305 NG leads on more of the dimensions that affect day-to-day work. It is the safer pick unless the Powertrac Steeltrac 18 is meaningfully cheaper for you after the dealer quote.
- Wide rotavator, thresher or heavy PTO work: the ACE DI-305 NG — it has the PTO horsepower to hold speed under load.
- Heavy mounted implements: the ACE DI-305 NG, which has the hydraulics to carry them.
- Loaded trolley and haulage: the ACE DI-305 NG — the extra weight helps it brake and hold a load on a gradient.
- Tightest budget, or if none of the above apply to you: the Powertrac Steeltrac 18. Paying for capability you never use is the most common and most expensive mistake at this size.
Before you decide
- Prices here are ex-showroom. Add roughly 7–10% for RTO registration and insurance, and get the on-road figure in writing from the dealer, itemised.
- Visit more than one dealer for each brand. Exchange value and finance terms vary between showrooms by more than the price gap between these two machines.
- Ask how far the nearest workshop is for each brand. A tractor that is down for a week in season costs more than the difference between these two.
- Drive both with an implement attached, not empty. An unloaded tractor tells you very little.
Specifications compared
| Specification | ACE DI-305 NG | Powertrac Steeltrac 18 |
|---|---|---|
| Ex-showroom price | ₹4.09 - ₹4.28 Lakh* | ₹2.44 - ₹3.8 Lakh* |
| Engine | ||
| HP | 26 HP | 16.2 HP |
| Cylinders | 2 | 1 |
| Displacement (CC) | 2044 CC | 895 CC |
| Engine RPM | 1800 RPM | NA |
| Air Filter | Dry Type | — |
| Cooling System | Water Cooled | — |
| Battery | 12 V 75 Ah | — |
| Alternator | 12 V 42 Amp | — |
| Torque | — | 61 NM |
| Transmission | ||
| Transmission Type | Partial Constant Mesh | Synchromesh |
| Clutch | Single Clutch | Single Clutch,(Diaphragm) Hub Reduction |
| Gearbox | 8 Forward + 2 Reverse | 8 Forward + 2 Reverse |
| Forward Speed | 2.29 - 27.78 kmph | 31.7 kmph |
| Reverse Speed | 2.86 - 11.31 kmph | 33.7 kmph |
| Brakes | ||
| Brake Type | Dry Disc | NA |
| PTO | ||
| PTO Type | 6 Splines | — |
| PTO RPM | 540 | — |
| PTO Power (HP) | 23.8 HP | 12.4 HP |
| Hydraulics | ||
| Lifting Capacity (Kg) | 1200 Kg | 550 KG |
| 3 Point Linkage | ADDC | — |
| Steering | ||
| Steering Type | Mechanical Steering | Mechanical |
| Dimensions & Weight | ||
| Total Weight (Kg) | 1780 KG | 941 KG |
| Wheelbase (MM) | 1855 MM | 1580 MM |
| Overall Length (MM) | 3550 MM | 2530 MM |
| Overall Width (MM) | 1700 MM | 1055 MM |
| Ground Clearance (MM) | 395 MM | 310 MM |
| Turning Radius | 2940 MM | 2800 MM |
| Fuel Tank Capacity (L) | 55 litre | 17.4 litre |
| Wheels & Tyres | ||
| Wheel Drive | 2 WD | 2 WD |
| Front Tyre | 6.00 X 16 | 5.25 X 14 |
| Rear Tyre | 12.4 X 28 | 8.3 X 18 / 8.3 x 20 |
| Other | ||
| Warranty | 2000 hours/ 2 Years | NA |
Related comparisons
- Mahindra Yuvraj 215 NXT vs Powertrac Steeltrac 18
- Farmtrac Steeltrac 18 vs Powertrac Steeltrac 18
- ACE DI-305 NG vs Farmtrac Steeltrac 18
- VST MT 171 DI - SAMRAAT vs Powertrac Steeltrac 18
- Escorts Steeltrac vs Powertrac Steeltrac 18
- Powertrac Steeltrac 18 vs VST MT 180 D 4WD
- Powertrac Steeltrac 18 vs VST 918 4WD
- Sonalika GT 20 vs Powertrac Steeltrac 18
Compare other models
Build your own side-by-side comparison of any two tractors in the catalogue.
Open the comparison tool